RPC Metamk Error: Revoca by compliance – Next.js Function called Problem Solution Manual
As a developer of the next. However, when it comes to interaction with decentralized applications (DAPP), for example, Metamk in Ethereum Blockchain, things can become a bit more complicated. Specifically, it has found an error message that seems: “RPC error: withdrawal execution”.
At first glance, this may seem a simple problem related to contract addresses or both versions. However, before denying the conclusions, we will enter what is happening and study possible solutions.
What is the RPC error: the execution has been withdrawn?
The “execution revocation” error of Ethereum Blockchain occurs if the execution of the Ethereum transaction fails for some reason. This may be due to a variety of factors that include:
- Smart contract logic errors
- Treatment validation problems
- Compatibility problems with other block chains
When the smart contract is withdrawn, this means that the block chain was rejected due to the transaction or function of the call due to an internal conflict or error.
Why could this error happen?
To better understand what is happening, let’s take a close look at the code. Assuming that you have created its Next.js project with Metamk integration, here are some potential causes:
1
The address of the agreement is not conservation : If your hook agreement specified in the contract management does not comply with the real address of the contract, which is in the block chain, it can cause the execution of the execution.
- Both version of the version : Even if you are using the right contract, there may be a conflict between the two version requested by MetamSk and what its code uses. Be sure to import the latest versions of all the contracts involved.
3
Intelligent logic errors
: Deliberately or involuntarily write the logic of incorrect intelligent contract can lead to compliance errors.
Problem solution actions:
To solve this problem, try the following:
- Verify the addresses of agreement and abis : verify that the addresses of your contract are correct and both versions meet the requirements of MetamSk and theirs.
- Update the Next.j code to match the Metamka Agreement address : Make sure your hook use the right contract address, even if it is different from what you offered in your code.
3
Check that there are no intelligent contract logic errors
: Check the code to ensure that there is no syntax or logical error that can cause compliance with retirement errors.
Use examples:
Here is an example of how you could modify your “Usemetamk” hook to verify the address of the contract and both:
“ JSX
Import {Metamk} of “@Metamk-Tonnect”;
Import {Usecontract} of “Next Use Actation”;
Const metamk = () => {
Const {account, Setaccunt} = usememk ();
ConstteMartcontract = async (contract name) => {
// Verify the address of the contract and both
If (! Account ||
Console.error (“Invalid contract name or both”);
return;
}
Attempt {
Est scort = wait for Exectecontra (account, contract);
Console.log (result);
} Capt (error) {
Console.error (error);
}
};
// example function to verify with
ASYNC Funtion ExecteConctrom (Account, Contract Title) {
// replace with the real implementation of the function
Returns a new promise ((solve, reject) => {
Const {tx} = wait the account.funcals [contract name].